On Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:32:18 +0300 "Denis V. Lunev" <den@sw.ru> wrote:Plese don't top-post. It makes replying to you rather awkward. When Peter says "with your patch in place" I assume that he's referring to Eric's latest patch, namely. --- a/fs/proc/generic.c~proc-remove-fix-proc-generic-d_revalidate +++ a/fs/proc/generic.c @@ -374,16 +374,9 @@ static int proc_delete_dentry(struct den return 1; } -static int proc_revalidate_dentry(struct dentry *dentry, struct nameidata *nd) -{ - d_drop(dentry); - return 0; -} - static struct dentry_operations proc_dentry_operations = { .d_delete = proc_delete_dentry, - .d_revalidate = proc_revalidate_dentry, }; /* So we still have problems, it appears. --
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| James Bottomley | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| Trent Piepho | Re: [PATCH] fakephp: Allocate PCI resources before adding the device |
| Antonio Almeida | HTB accuracy for high speed |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
git: | |
