On Mon, Dec 10 2007, Daniel Phillips wrote:
quoted text
> On Monday 10 December 2007 05:19, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > Precisely. So forgive me for thinking this patch hasn't seen very
> > varied testing, that's 2 errors (one simple, one bad - broken was NOT
> > a gross exageration, thanks) in very few lines.
> 
> See the [RFC]?  If I had meant Request For Flaming, I would have written 
> that.  Thankyou for the catch.

The same mail that contained this part, copied verbatim:

"Let me close with perhaps the most relevant remarks: the attached code
 has been in heavy testing and in production for months now.  Thus there
 is nothing theoretical when I say it works, and the patch speaks for
 itself in terms of obvious correctness."

We must have differing opinions on what obvious correctness is.

Future replies to /dev/null, please.

-- 
Jens Axboe

--
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/