On Monday 10 December 2007 03:41, Jens Axboe wrote:What happens on the second iteration of a recursive submission loop is exactly nothing, as is right and proper. The throttling has already been done, and all the state necessary to perform the unthrottle was recorded in the bio. Everything seems to be in order there, and the algorithm does indeed perform its function as designed, though to be sure we have not tested it on -mm branch, only on mainline. Regards, Daniel --
| Alan | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command |
| Con Kolivas | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Mike Galbraith | Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke |
git: | |
| Andy Parkins | svn:externals using git submodules |
| Jeff King | Re: Terminology question about remote branches. |
| Jon Smirl | ! [rejected] master -> master (non-fast forward) |
| Miles Bader | "git pull REMOTE" question |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Ari Constancio | Re: Squid/authpf with lookups on Active Directory |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Michael | Performance: OpenVPN vs IPsec |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11144] New: dhcp doesn't work with iwl4965 |
| David Miller | Re: xfrm_state locking regression... |
