Arjan van de Ven wrote:... But doesn't that approach also make it nearly impossible to script ???? Having to hack source for any apps that one wants to use it on sounds rather barbaric.. (sure I *can* still script it, with background tasksand wait and .. but that's getting rather complex again). Meanwhile.. I'll now cook up a module to try the set/remove_acceptable_latency thing. Thanks -
| Alan | Re: [RFC] Heads up on sys_fallocate() |
| Rafael J. Wysocki | [Bug #11215] INFO: possible recursive locking detected ps2_command |
| Con Kolivas | Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Mike Galbraith | Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke |
git: | |
| Andy Parkins | svn:externals using git submodules |
| Jeff King | Re: Terminology question about remote branches. |
| Jon Smirl | ! [rejected] master -> master (non-fast forward) |
| Miles Bader | "git pull REMOTE" question |
| Richard Stallman | Real men don't attack straw men |
| Ari Constancio | Re: Squid/authpf with lookups on Active Directory |
| GVG GVG | ssh_exchange_identification: Connection closed by remote host |
| Michael | Performance: OpenVPN vs IPsec |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Andrew Morton | Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 11144] New: dhcp doesn't work with iwl4965 |
| David Miller | Re: xfrm_state locking regression... |
