-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Chris Friesen wrote:
quoted text
>> A possible remedy is to return the ticks since process start time, which
>> delays the wrap around much further.  POSIX only demands consistency
>> within the same process.
> 
> This would be an interesting solution.
> 
> The man page for linux states that the return code is time since system
> boot, so that could realistically be expected to correlate between
> different processes.

The Linux man page is documenting existing functionality on top of what
the standard requires.  Programmers should ever only require what the
standard guarantees.

I am perfectly willing to support a solution where the time is measured
from process startup time.  The only code using times() I found is
cross-platform and most likely does not depend on the value returned is
usable in isolation (only in a difference).

- --
➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFHNKTZ2ijCOnn/RHQRAv2wAJsHOnWRrbE2N2Z4R35bsU1+BIZEGQCguaxL
zY9f4XEhJnAoNF5jFxm76qI=
=0nsU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/