In message <1194280730.6271.145.camel@localhost>, Dave Hansen writes:[...] [...] This #ifdef'd code in unionfs is actually not enabled. I left it there as a reminder of possible future things to come (esp. if nameidata gets split). There's a related comment earlier in fs/unionfs/lookup.c:init_lower_nd() that says: #ifdef ALLOC_LOWER_ND_FILE /* * XXX: one day we may need to have the lower return an open file * for us. It is not needed in 2.6.23-rc1 for nfs2/nfs3, but may * very well be needed for nfs4. */ struct file *file; #endif /* ALLOC_LOWER_ND_FILE */ In the interest of keeping unionfs as simple as I can, when I implemented the whole "pass a lower nd" stuff, I left thos bits of semi-experimental #ifdef code for this lower file upon open-intent. It's not enabled and up until now, it didn't seem to be needed. Do you think unionfs has to start using this nd->intent.open.file stuff? Thanks, Erez. -
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| James Bottomley | Re: Announce: Linux-next (Or Andrew's dream :-)) |
| Andrew Morton | echo mem > /sys/power/state |
| Peter Zijlstra | [PATCH 00/23] per device dirty throttling -v8 |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 18/37] dccp: Support for Mandatory options |
| Michael S. Tsirkin | Re: [RFC PATCH v2 03/19] vbus: add connection-client helper infrastructure |
| NeilBrown | [PATCH 00/18] Assorted md patches headed for 2.6.30 |
| Justin Piszcz | General question (scheduler) with SSDs? |
| Neil Brown | Re: Any hope for a 27 disk RAID6+1HS array with four disks reporting "No md superb... |
| Ryan Wagoner | High IO Wait with RAID 1 |
