> On Nov 7, 2007 1:55 PM, Tejun Heo <htejun@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Florian La Roche wrote:
>>> Hello all,
>>>
>>> I've taking email addresses from the last NCQ blacklist changes going
>>> into the kernel.
>>> This Fujitsu drive also gives me spurious command completions. Detailed
>>> output also available at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=366181.
>>>
>>> Let me know if you need more info or anything else.
>>>
>>> --- drivers/ata/libata-core.c
>>> +++ drivers/ata/libata-core.c
>>> @@ -4222,6 +4222,7 @@
>>> { "WDC WD740ADFD-00NLR1", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, },
>>> { "WDC WD3200AAJS-00RYA0", "12.01B01", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, },
>>> { "FUJITSU MHV2080BH", "00840028", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, },
>>> + { "FUJITSU MHW2160BJ G2", NULL, ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ },
>>> { "ST9120822AS", "3.CLF", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, },
>>> { "ST9160821AS", "3.CLF", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, },
>>> { "ST9160821AS", "3.ALD", ATA_HORKAGE_NONCQ, },
>> Thanks. We're currently trying to find out what's actually going on
>> with all these drives. At first, drives which got blacklisted aren't
>> many and made sense (had other problems with NCQ, etc..) but with new
>> generation drives from many vendors showing the same symptom, we aren't
>> too sure now.
>
> Is there a way to tell whether Windows is using NCQ or not? I checked
> the system log (or whatever it's called) on my notebook and is clean
> but I'm not sure it's using NCQ (I don't even know if it'd log
> spurious completions somewhere).
