Re: [PATCH 0/6] MN10300: Add the MN10300 architecture to Linux kernel [try #4]

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: David Howells
Date: Thursday, November 8, 2007 - 12:11 pm

Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org> wrote:


Done.  What about ASFLAGS and LDFLAGS?


That makes sense if I'm not calculating UNIT or PROCESSOR anyway.  However,
see below.


No.  I think all the arch headers should really appear to be #included under
asm/.  That means that the structure would have to be:

	include/asm-mn10300/asb2303/asm/proc/*.h

That then puts all these header files several levels further down, which isn't
that good.


That's the only plus, but it's a smaller plus than not interpolating several
levels of almost empty directory into the paths for the proc- and unit-specific
headers.


I could.  Or I could do what everyone else does.

Actually, what you perhaps ought to do for a start is to move the individual
include/asm-$ARCH dirs to arch/$ARCH/asm and then you can avoid that symlink
too.


Done.


I don't see why it needs modification.  $(KBUILD_IMAGE) == $(boot)/zImage for
the zImage target.


Done.


Done.


The copyright assignment on some of these files was made by MEI.  I'm not sure
I can change them.


Yes.  Done.


Apparently not.  Consider it gone.


Done.


I don't remember why.  It doesn't seem to be necessary now, however, so it's
now gone.


Gone.


Gone.

David
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH 0/6] MN10300: Add the MN10300 architecture to L ..., David Howells, (Thu Nov 8, 12:11 pm)