Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: ciol <ciol13@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Thursday, November 8, 2007 - 9:38 am

ciol wrote:

I'm new to LKML, and because this is "my first release" I've held off 
saying that the development model scares me.  No doubt I need to see it 
through a couple of releases, minimum.  If I was less sanguine I might 
say something about how often "this is tested and ready to be pushed 
upstream" presages "the system is broken and doesn't work."  I think if 
most CIOs monitored the list they'd never let Linux anywhere near their 
business systems.  It's scary!
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, Eric W. Biederman, (Mon Nov 12, 7:09 am)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, Chris Snook, (Thu Nov 8, 10:26 am)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, David Newall, (Thu Nov 8, 9:38 am)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, Stephen Hemminger, (Thu Nov 8, 2:18 am)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, Rik van Riel, (Wed Nov 7, 7:06 pm)