Re: [PATCH] virtio config_ops refactoring

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Rusty Russell
Date: Wednesday, November 7, 2007 - 7:20 pm

On Thursday 08 November 2007 04:30:50 Anthony Liguori wrote:

-ETOOMUCHMAGIC.  We should either expose all the XX interfaces (but this isn't 
a high-speed interface, so let's not) or not "sometimes" convert endianness.  
Getting surprises because a field happens to be packed into 4 bytes is 
counter-intuitive.

Since your most trivial implementation is to do a byte at a time, I don't 
think you have a good argument on that basis either.

Cheers,
Rusty.

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: virtio config_ops refactoring, Anthony Liguori, (Tue Nov 6, 4:05 pm)
[PATCH] virtio config_ops refactoring, Rusty Russell, (Tue Nov 6, 11:04 pm)
Re: [PATCH] virtio config_ops refactoring, Anthony Liguori, (Wed Nov 7, 10:30 am)
Re: [PATCH] virtio config_ops refactoring, Rusty Russell, (Wed Nov 7, 7:20 pm)