Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » November » 7

Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: ciol <ciol13@...>
To: <linux-kernel@...>
Subject: Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?
Date: Wednesday, November 7, 2007 - 7:11 pm

Rik van Riel wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paranoia

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, ciol, (Wed Nov 7, 6:56 pm)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, Eric W. Biederman, (Mon Nov 12, 7:09 am)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, Chris Snook, (Thu Nov 8, 10:26 am)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, ciol, (Thu Nov 8, 4:41 pm)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, Chris Snook, (Thu Nov 8, 8:15 pm)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, David Newall, (Thu Nov 8, 9:38 am)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, Stephen Hemminger, (Thu Nov 8, 2:18 am)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Nov 7, 9:36 pm)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, ciol, (Thu Nov 8, 4:45 pm)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, Rik van Riel, (Wed Nov 7, 7:06 pm)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, ciol, (Wed Nov 7, 7:11 pm)