Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » November » 7

[poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: ciol
Subject: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?
Date: Wednesday, November 7, 2007 - 3:56 pm

Hi, I'd like to ask you a few questions:

* Do you like the way linux distributions integrate the kernel?

* Wouldn't you prefer they ship with the stable and still maintained 
2.6.16.X, while providing optionally the latest kernel for those who 
want or just have a new hardware?

* Do you think the megafreeze development model [1] and the "I don't 
trust in upstream" development model are broken? (And why)



[1] http://www.modeemi.fi/~tuomov/b/archives/2007/03/03/T19_15_26/


(I'm going to ask this for several projects, not only the kernel)

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, ciol, (Wed Nov 7, 3:56 pm)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, Rik van Riel, (Wed Nov 7, 4:06 pm)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, ciol, (Wed Nov 7, 4:11 pm)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, Adrian Bunk, (Wed Nov 7, 6:36 pm)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, Stephen Hemminger, (Wed Nov 7, 11:18 pm)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, David Newall, (Thu Nov 8, 6:38 am)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, Chris Snook, (Thu Nov 8, 7:26 am)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, ciol, (Thu Nov 8, 1:41 pm)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, ciol, (Thu Nov 8, 1:45 pm)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, Chris Snook, (Thu Nov 8, 5:15 pm)
Re: [poll] Is the megafreeze development model broken?, Eric W. Biederman, (Mon Nov 12, 4:09 am)