On Wed, 7 Nov 2007, Johannes Weiner wrote:

quoted text
> Hi Christoph,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 05:11:34PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > @@ -613,11 +606,7 @@ static void shrink_dcache_for_umount_sub
> >  			spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
> >  			list_for_each_entry(loop, &dentry->d_subdirs,
> >  					    d_u.d_child) {
> > -				if (!list_empty(&loop->d_lru)) {
> > -					dentry_stat.nr_unused--;
> > -					list_del_init(&loop->d_lru);
> > -				}
> > -
> > +				dentry_lru_remove(dentry);
> 
> Shouldn't this be dentry_lru_remove(loop)?

Correct. Andrew: This needs to go into your tree to fix the patch that is 
already there:


[PATCH] dcache: use the correct variable.

We need to use "loop" instead of "dentry"

Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>

Index: linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c
===================================================================
--- linux-2.6.orig/fs/dcache.c	2007-11-07 10:26:20.000000000 -0800
+++ linux-2.6/fs/dcache.c	2007-11-07 10:26:27.000000000 -0800
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@ static void shrink_dcache_for_umount_sub
 			spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
 			list_for_each_entry(loop, &dentry->d_subdirs,
 					    d_u.d_child) {
-				dentry_lru_remove(dentry);
+				dentry_lru_remove(loop);
 				__d_drop(loop);
 				cond_resched_lock(&dcache_lock);
 			}
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/