On Wed, 7 November 2007 09:50:27 +0100, Johannes Weiner wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 05:11:34PM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > @@ -613,11 +606,7 @@ static void shrink_dcache_for_umount_sub
> >  			spin_lock(&dcache_lock);
> >  			list_for_each_entry(loop, &dentry->d_subdirs,
> >  					    d_u.d_child) {
> > -				if (!list_empty(&loop->d_lru)) {
> > -					dentry_stat.nr_unused--;
> > -					list_del_init(&loop->d_lru);
> > -				}
> > -
> > +				dentry_lru_remove(dentry);
> 
> Shouldn't this be dentry_lru_remove(loop)?

Looks like it.  Once this is fixed, feel free to add
Acked-by: Joern Engel <joern@logfs.org>

Jörn

-- 
It does not require a majority to prevail, but rather an irate,
tireless minority keen to set brush fires in people's minds.
-- Samuel Adams
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/