Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » November » 7

Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...>
To: <bunk@...>
Cc: <darwish.07@...>, <pavel@...>, <casey@...>, <akpm@...>, <linux-security-module@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <viro@...>, <torvalds@...>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
Date: Tuesday, November 6, 2007 - 9:03 pm

Hello.

Adrian Bunk wrote:

TOMOYO assumes that "one character" equals to "one byte"
since TOMOYO doesn't consider encoding.

According to your definition of "character" (i.e. it may be multibyte),
TOMOYO doesn't implement "match one character" pattern.
TOMOYO implements "match one byte" pattern.

Thanks.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Version 10 (2.6.24-rc1) Smack: Simplified Mandatory ..., Casey Schaufler, (Fri Nov 2, 4:50 pm)
[PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser, Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sat Nov 3, 12:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Adrian Bunk, (Tue Nov 6, 2:33 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Kyle Moffett, (Tue Nov 6, 4:26 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Adrian Bunk, (Tue Nov 6, 4:56 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Tue Nov 6, 7:34 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Adrian Bunk, (Tue Nov 6, 7:47 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Tue Nov 6, 8:23 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Kyle Moffett, (Tue Nov 6, 8:49 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue Nov 6, 11:53 am)
[PATCH] Fix isspace() and other ctype.h functions to ignore ..., Kyle Moffett, (Wed Nov 7, 6:56 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Adrian Bunk, (Tue Nov 6, 9:34 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Tue Nov 6, 10:05 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Adrian Bunk, (Tue Nov 6, 10:10 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Tue Nov 6, 10:30 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Alan Cox, (Tue Nov 6, 7:02 am)
[PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parse..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sun Nov 4, 8:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Pavel Machek, (Sun Nov 11, 8:44 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sun Nov 11, 2:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Jakob Oestergaard, (Sat Nov 10, 1:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sat Nov 10, 3:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sun Nov 4, 4:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Pavel Machek, (Sun Nov 4, 8:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Mon Nov 5, 5:41 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Linus Torvalds, (Mon Nov 5, 12:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Adrian Bunk, (Tue Nov 6, 4:06 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue Nov 6, 11:39 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Adrian Bunk, (Tue Nov 6, 7:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue Nov 6, 7:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Adrian Bunk, (Tue Nov 6, 8:07 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue Nov 6, 8:27 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Adrian Bunk, (Tue Nov 6, 8:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue Nov 6, 9:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Adrian Bunk, (Tue Nov 6, 9:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Alan Cox, (Wed Nov 7, 11:08 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Linus Torvalds, (Wed Nov 7, 12:09 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Tetsuo Handa, (Tue Nov 6, 9:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Mon Nov 5, 7:38 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Tetsuo Handa, (Mon Nov 5, 5:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Adrian Bunk, (Tue Nov 6, 6:00 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Tetsuo Handa, (Tue Nov 6, 8:27 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Adrian Bunk, (Tue Nov 6, 9:58 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Tetsuo Handa, (Tue Nov 6, 10:32 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Adrian Bunk, (Tue Nov 6, 10:59 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Tetsuo Handa, (Tue Nov 6, 11:27 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Adrian Bunk, (Tue Nov 6, 6:42 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sun Nov 4, 9:23 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Casey Schaufler, (Sun Nov 4, 12:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Kyle Moffett, (Sat Nov 3, 2:30 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sat Nov 3, 6:12 pm)