Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...>, Ray Lee <ray-lk@...>, Bo <bosse@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, November 6, 2007 - 3:53 pm

On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:50:13AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:

OK, thanks Peter for the explanation.

Cheers,
Willy

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, Andi Kleen, (Mon Nov 5, 8:26 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, Jesse Barnes, (Wed Nov 7, 2:38 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Nov 5, 9:19 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, Willy Tarreau, (Tue Nov 6, 3:40 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, H. Peter Anvin, (Tue Nov 6, 3:50 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, Willy Tarreau, (Tue Nov 6, 3:53 pm)