login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
November
»
6
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Willy Tarreau <w@...>
To: H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...>, Ray Lee <ray-lk@...>, Bo <bosse@...>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Jesse Barnes <jesse.barnes@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Subject:
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
Date: Tuesday, November 6, 2007 - 3:53 pm
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 11:50:13AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
quoted text
> Willy Tarreau wrote: > >Just out of curiosity, what would be the problem if the MTRRs covered more > >than the memory size ? For instance, instead of having 512 MB at 4G, why > >not have 1G at 4G ? > > That's fine, *as long as* you don't have any I/O devices there, > including things like UMA graphics devices or memory areas used by SMM. > In theory, those should be marked reserved in e820. In practice...
OK, thanks Peter for the explanation. Cheers, Willy -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [thread] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, Andi Kleen
, (Mon Nov 5, 8:26 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, Jesse Barnes
, (Wed Nov 7, 2:38 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Nov 5, 9:19 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, Willy Tarreau
, (Tue Nov 6, 3:40 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Tue Nov 6, 3:50 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, Willy Tarreau
, (Tue Nov 6, 3:53 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
KOSAKI Motohiro
[bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin"
Faik Uygur
Re: Linux 2.6.21-rc1
Greg KH
[GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24
Trent Piepho
[PATCH] [POWERPC] Improve (in|out)_beXX() asm code
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
Jens Axboe
Re: [BUG] New Kernel Bugs
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
1 user
and
819 guests
online.
Online users
zeekec
Syndicate