login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
November
»
6
Re: UML defconfig building failed again
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...>
To: Al Viro <viro@...>
Cc: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...>, LKML <linux-kernel@...>, <jdike@...>, <user-mode-linux-devel@...>
Subject:
Re: UML defconfig building failed again
Date: Tuesday, November 6, 2007 - 12:07 pm
On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 02:11:43PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 07:46:02PM +0800, WANG Cong wrote: > > > > Hi, Jeff! > > > > I used today's linus-tree and defconfig to compile uml, but it failed. Error messages are > > things like: > > > > In file included from include/asm/processor-generic.h:13, > > from include/asm/processor.h:77, > > from include/asm/thread_info.h:11, > > from include/linux/thread_info.h:21, > > from include/linux/preempt.h:9, > > from include/linux/spinlock.h:49, > > from include/linux/seqlock.h:29, > > from include/linux/time.h:8, > > from include/linux/timex.h:57, > > from include/linux/sched.h:53, > > from arch/um/include/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:2, > > from arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1: > > include/asm/ptrace.h:50: warning: ???struct user_fxsr_struct??? declared inside parameter list > > include/asm/ptrace.h:50: warning: its scope is only this definition or declaration, which is probably not what you want > > include/asm/ptrace.h:52: warning: ???struct user_fxsr_struct??? declared inside parameter list > > In file included from include/linux/timer.h:5, > > from include/linux/sched.h:87, > > from arch/um/include/sysdep/kernel-offsets.h:2, > > from arch/um/kernel/asm-offsets.c:1: > > include/linux/ktime.h: In function ???ktime_set???: > > include/linux/ktime.h:84: warning: comparison is always false due to limited range of data type > > > > {snip} > > > > It seems like CONFIG_X86_32 was not set. Any ideas? > > Sigh... Kbuild breakage this time... See if %s/\<[AC]FLAGS\>/KBUILD_&/g > in arch/um/Makefile-i386 helps.
Ups - my bad. I have somehow overlooked those two assignments in the middle. Sam -
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
UML defconfig building failed again
, WANG Cong
, (Tue Nov 6, 7:46 am)
Re: UML defconfig building failed again
, Al Viro
, (Tue Nov 6, 10:11 am)
Re: UML defconfig building failed again
, Sam Ravnborg
, (Tue Nov 6, 12:07 pm)
Re: UML defconfig building failed again
, Jeff Dike
, (Tue Nov 6, 12:02 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
David Miller
Re: Slow DOWN, please!!!
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 001/196] Chinese: Add the known_regression URI to the HOWTO
Bart Van Assche
Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
Heiko Carstens
Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 -- sys_fallocate
git
:
linux-netdev
:
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
Jan Engelhardt
Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49
openbsd-misc
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
1 user
and
1010 guests
online.
Online users
ezinearticles
Syndicate