Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwish.07@...>, Pavel Machek <pavel@...>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...>, <akpm@...>, <linux-security-module@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Al Viro <viro@...>
Date: Tuesday, November 6, 2007 - 11:39 am

On Tue, 6 Nov 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:

I really would expect that kernel strings don't have an encoding. They're 
just C strings: a NUL-terminated stream of bytes.

		Linus
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser, Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sat Nov 3, 12:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Jakob Oestergaard, (Sat Nov 10, 1:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Linus Torvalds, (Tue Nov 6, 11:39 am)