On 04-11-2007 01:04, Theodore Tso wrote:Why not? Is it better to stay enemies forever? Sometimes, after the war miracles happen and bitter enemies become friends... ... IMHO, the main problem is talking about these things instead of some basics: 1. BSD copyright is simple here: "1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice, this list of conditions and the following disclaimer." So, when I read on lkml, there are people, thinking they actually can add here and there something about GPL, or even remove it at all, we have a problem... Any legal, moral or ethical reasoning here is useless (but gathering some weapons should be safe bet). 2. After retaining such a copyright, IMHO the war is over and BSD guys call as the best friends! If we are very clever and stay with this only, they probably can even become our slaves (if they are so "incredibly silly" as presumed). 3. Otherwise, we have a problem: anything added or changed looks like BSD copyrighted too. And this is really a legal, moral and ethical problem, but it's our internal problem (I doubt BSD people are silly enough to fight for these additions). If you haven't guessed, I'm in the earlier camp... Regards, Jarek P. -
| David Miller | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| debian developer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Roland Dreier | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
git: | |
| Arjan van de Ven | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Paul E. McKenney | Re: iptables very slow after commit 784544739a25c30637397ace5489eeb6e15d7d49 |
