Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...>
Cc: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwish.07@...>, Casey Schaufler <casey@...>, <akpm@...>, <torvalds@...>, <linux-security-module@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, November 6, 2007 - 4:26 am

On Nov 06, 2007, at 01:33:05, Adrian Bunk wrote:

Actually, you don't need to.  You tell them it expects UTF-8 encoded  
strings and be done with it.  All US-ASCII characters from 0 through  
127 (IE: high bit clear) are exactly the same in UTF-8, and UTF-8  
special characters have the high bit set in all bytes.  Therefore you  
just assume that anything with the high bit set is part of a word and  
you can handle basic UTF-8.  (It doesn't work on special UTF-8 space  
characters like nonbreaking space and similar, but handling those is  
significantly more complicated).

Cheers,
Kyle Moffett

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser, Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sat Nov 3, 12:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Kyle Moffett, (Tue Nov 6, 4:26 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Jakob Oestergaard, (Sat Nov 10, 1:05 pm)