Home » Mailing list archives » linux-kernel » 2007 » November » 5

Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of keeping it

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
[view in full thread]
From: David Miller <davem@...>
To: <kaber@...>
Cc: <djohnson+linux-kernel@...>, <jes@...>, <mchan@...>, <ram.vepa@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, <netdev@...>, <bguo@...>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of keeping it
Date: Monday, November 5, 2007 - 7:15 pm

From: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Nov 2007 19:00:19 +0100


Completely agreed.  We should not do this by default when %99
of the networking stack simply does not care about this.


Someone will have to find a way to remove some other fields in
sk_buff before I'm going to allow more space to be eaten up
by this completely fringe case feature.
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
Messages in current thread:
expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device?, Dave Johnson, (Wed Oct 31, 2:43 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., Stephen Hemminger, (Wed Oct 31, 3:33 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., Ben Greear, (Wed Oct 31, 9:06 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., Stephen Hemminger, (Wed Oct 31, 9:23 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 12:50 am)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., Ben Greear, (Thu Nov 1, 11:04 am)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., Dave Johnson, (Thu Nov 1, 5:36 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., Dave Johnson, (Fri Nov 2, 2:08 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., David Miller, (Fri Nov 2, 5:20 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., Michael Chan, (Fri Nov 2, 5:52 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 5:58 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., Rick Jones, (Thu Nov 1, 5:48 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 5:59 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., Rick Jones, (Thu Nov 1, 6:04 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 6:07 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., Rick Jones, (Thu Nov 1, 7:26 pm)
[PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of ke..., Dave Johnson, (Mon Nov 5, 1:46 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable o..., Patrick McHardy, (Mon Nov 5, 2:00 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable o..., David Miller, (Mon Nov 5, 7:15 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable o..., Patrick McHardy, (Mon Nov 5, 8:21 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable o..., Krzysztof Halasa, (Tue Nov 6, 2:03 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable o..., Patrick McHardy, (Tue Nov 6, 7:55 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable o..., Ben Greear, (Tue Nov 6, 2:56 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable o..., Krzysztof Halasa, (Tue Nov 6, 4:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable o..., David Miller, (Mon Nov 5, 8:35 pm)
[PATCH 2/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of ke..., Dave Johnson, (Mon Nov 5, 1:47 pm)
RE: [PATCH 2/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable o..., Ramkrishna Vepa, (Mon Nov 5, 10:39 pm)
RE: [PATCH 2/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable o..., Ramkrishna Vepa, (Tue Nov 6, 2:28 pm)
RE: [PATCH 2/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable o..., Dave Johnson, (Tue Nov 6, 2:34 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., David Miller, (Thu Nov 1, 5:35 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., Ben Greear, (Wed Oct 31, 9:31 pm)
Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX dev..., David Miller, (Wed Oct 31, 9:10 pm)