Eric W. Biederman wrote:
quoted text
>>
>>> However, that being said, doing so is trivial, and it might help some
>>> debugging hack; anything that makes debugging easier is a Good Thing[TM].
>> Yeah. Even if it was just re-using the boot-time stack area temporarily, 
>> just to give code the choice to use a common set of instructions.
> 
> If I had to do it from scratch today I would make the 32-bit entry
> point require a stack, segments and use C calling conventions to pass
> struct boot_params *.
> 
> Besides %esi I'm not really fond of requiring anything in the 32bit
> entrypoint.  At the same time I totally agree that it is always nice
> to provide way more then you need.
> 

Nailing down the interface as hard as possible is a good idea, to avoid 
tying your hands for the future.

	-hpa
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/