Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@...>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@...>, <akpm@...>, <torvalds@...>, <linux-security-module@...>, <linux-kernel@...>, Al Viro <viro@...>
Date: Monday, November 5, 2007 - 5:41 am

On Sun, Nov 04, 2007 at 12:28:48PM +0000, Pavel Machek wrote:

Ok, Could someone suggest a better idea please ?. 

I thought about packing the rules in a structure and sending
it over an ioctl() command. Is this applicable ?

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser, Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sat Nov 3, 12:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Jakob Oestergaard, (Sat Nov 10, 1:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Mon Nov 5, 5:41 am)