Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Bo <bosse@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <mpm@...>
Date: Monday, November 5, 2007 - 4:06 am

On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:38:24PM +0100, Bo Brantén wrote:

Also, check if a BIOS upgrade is available -- it's possible that a
newer BIOS will have fixed this.

--
Joseph Fannin
jfannin@gmail.com

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
x86_64 ten times slower than i386, Bo Brantén, (Sat Nov 3, 8:31 am)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, Matt Mackall, (Sat Nov 3, 12:26 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, Bo Brantén, (Sat Nov 3, 6:38 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, Bo Brantén, (Mon Nov 5, 6:15 am)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Nov 5, 1:22 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, Bo Brantén, (Mon Nov 5, 12:00 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, Bo Brantén, (Sat Nov 10, 9:41 am)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Nov 5, 1:23 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, Bo Brantén, (Mon Nov 5, 2:46 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, H. Peter Anvin, (Mon Nov 5, 3:11 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, Joseph Fannin, (Mon Nov 5, 4:06 am)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, H. Peter Anvin, (Sat Nov 3, 7:30 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386, Matt Mackall, (Sat Nov 3, 6:54 pm)