login
Login
/
Register
Search
Forums
News
Blogs
Features
Site
Home
»
Mailing list archives
»
linux-kernel
»
2007
»
November
»
5
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
view
thread
!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
[view in full thread]
From:
Joseph Fannin <jfannin@...>
To: Bo <bosse@...>
Cc: <linux-kernel@...>, <mpm@...>
Subject:
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
Date: Monday, November 5, 2007 - 4:06 am
On Sat, Nov 03, 2007 at 11:38:24PM +0100, Bo Brantén wrote:
quoted text
> On Sat, 3 Nov 2007, Matt Mackall wrote: > >> This is typically due to a problem with the setup of your MTRRs. Try >> booting with mem=nnnM where nnn is some number smaller than your >> actual amount of memory. > > Thank you for that advice, the system has 4GB and if I boot with mem=3072M > it will run as fast as normal
Also, check if a BIOS upgrade is available -- it's possible that a newer BIOS will have fixed this. -- Joseph Fannin
jfannin@gmail.com
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Previous message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Next message: [
thread
] [
date
] [
author
]
Messages in current thread:
x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, Bo Brantén
, (Sat Nov 3, 8:31 am)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, Matt Mackall
, (Sat Nov 3, 12:26 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, Bo Brantén
, (Sat Nov 3, 6:38 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, Bo Brantén
, (Mon Nov 5, 6:15 am)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Nov 5, 1:22 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, Bo Brantén
, (Mon Nov 5, 12:00 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, Bo Brantén
, (Sat Nov 10, 9:41 am)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Nov 5, 1:23 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, Bo Brantén
, (Mon Nov 5, 2:46 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Mon Nov 5, 3:11 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, Joseph Fannin
, (Mon Nov 5, 4:06 am)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, H. Peter Anvin
, (Sat Nov 3, 7:30 pm)
Re: x86_64 ten times slower than i386
, Matt Mackall
, (Sat Nov 3, 6:54 pm)
Navigation
Create content
Mailing list archives
Recent posts
Popular discussions
linux-kernel
:
Greg Kroah-Hartman
[PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches
Tarkan Erimer
Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3
Matt Mackall
Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c compiling
James Bottomley
Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel
openbsd-misc
:
linux-netdev
:
Gerrit Renker
[PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side)
David Miller
[GIT]: Networking
Jarek Poplawski
[PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock().
Natalie Protasevich
[BUG] New Kernel Bugs
git
:
Colocation donated by:
Who's online
There are currently
1 user
and
612 guests
online.
Online users
harmanmonstone
Syndicate