Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Ahmed S. Darwish
Date: Sunday, November 4, 2007 - 1:06 pm

On 11/3/07, Ahmed S. Darwish <darwish.07@gmail.com> wrote:

Is it right to do the kzalloc with the semaphore being held? Will the
lock be held forever If kzalloc failed and -ENOMEM was returned ?

Thanks,

-- 
Ahmed S. Darwish
Homepage: http://darwish.07.googlepages.com
Blog: http://darwish-07.blogspot.com
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful ..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sun Nov 4, 1:06 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful ..., Jakob Oestergaard, (Sat Nov 10, 10:05 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful ..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sat Nov 10, 12:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful ..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sun Nov 11, 11:37 am)