Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Casey Schaufler <casey@...>
Cc: <akpm@...>, <torvalds@...>, <linux-security-module@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, November 4, 2007 - 4:06 pm

On 11/3/07, Ahmed S. Darwish <darwish.07@gmail.com> wrote:

Is it right to do the kzalloc with the semaphore being held? Will the
lock be held forever If kzalloc failed and -ENOMEM was returned ?

Thanks,

-- 
Ahmed S. Darwish
Homepage: http://darwish.07.googlepages.com
Blog: http://darwish-07.blogspot.com
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser, Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sat Nov 3, 12:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Jakob Oestergaard, (Sat Nov 10, 1:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sun Nov 4, 4:06 pm)