Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Pavel Machek
Date: Sunday, November 4, 2007 - 5:28 am

Hi!


Can we avoid string parsers in the kernel?



This sounds like enough for 'NAK'.

						Pavel,
		who still thinks smack rules should be parsed
		in userspace and compiled into selinux rules...
		
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful ..., Pavel Machek, (Sun Nov 4, 5:28 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful ..., Jakob Oestergaard, (Sat Nov 10, 10:05 am)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful ..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sat Nov 10, 12:45 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful ..., Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sun Nov 11, 11:37 am)