Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Ahmed S. Darwish <darwish.07@...>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@...>, <akpm@...>, <torvalds@...>, <linux-security-module@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Sunday, November 4, 2007 - 8:28 am

Hi!


Can we avoid string parsers in the kernel?



This sounds like enough for 'NAK'.

						Pavel,
		who still thinks smack rules should be parsed
		in userspace and compiled into selinux rules...
		
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser, Ahmed S. Darwish, (Sat Nov 3, 12:43 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Jakob Oestergaard, (Sat Nov 10, 1:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful p..., Pavel Machek, (Sun Nov 4, 8:28 am)