On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:

quoted text
> Heh. It definitely hasn't gotten lost by "the git software".

No, it sure hasn't.  In fact it was staring me right in the face and I 
didn't realize it.

quoted text
> In fact, with 
> the kinds of hints you already gave, git makes it really _trivial_ to find 
> it.
> 
> Here's what you do:
> 
> 	git log v2.6.23.. --author=Wilcox
> 
> and then just search for "scan_mutex", in the hope that Matthew wrote a 
> nice commit message. And yes, he did, so in less than a blink you get:
> 
> 	commit 6b7f123f378743d739377871c0cbfbaf28c7d25a
> 	Author: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@wil.cx>
> 	Date:   Tue Jun 26 15:18:51 2007 -0600
> 	
> 	    [SCSI] Fix async scanning double-add problems
> 
> 	    Stress-testing and some thought has revealed some places where
> 	    asynchronous scanning needs some more attention to locking.
> 	
> 	     - Since async_scan is a bit, we need to hold the host_lock while
> 	       modifying it to prevent races against other CPUs modifying the word
> 	       that bit is in.  This is probably a theoretical race for the moment,
> 	       but other patches may change that.
> 	     - The async_scan bit means not only that this host is being scanned
> 	       asynchronously, but that all the devices attached to this host are not
> 	       yet added to sysfs.  So we must ensure that this bit is always in sync.
> 	       I've chosen to do this with the scan_mutex since it's already acquired
> 	       in most of the right places.
> 		...
> 
> which I assume is the commit you're talking about.

Yep, that's the one.

Alan Stern

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/