On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 05:16:28PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
quoted text
> On Thu, 29 Nov 2007, Greg KH wrote:
> 
> > Ok, how about this function.  If it errors out, it is free to just call
> > kfree() on the kobject.  Seems simple enough to me, any objections?  If
> > not, I'll go through and fix up the whole tree...
> 
> Looks good, _provided_ you also get rid of kobject_register().  Which 
> you pretty much would have to do anyway, since it doesn't accept the 
> ktype or the name as an argument.

Yes, I would do that at the same time.

Well, not at the _exact_ same time, it might take a few patches to get
there :)

thanks for the review,

greg k-h
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/