On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:42:00PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
quoted text
> This patch (as1020) adds a check to kobject_init() to insure that the
> ktype field is not NULL.  This is just for safety's sake; as far as I
> know there are no remaining places where the field is left unset.  But
> ironically, kset_init() did fail to set it!  The patch fixes that and
> removes some redundant initialization in kset_createa().
> 
> The patch also fixes up elevator_init(), where ktype was set after
> calling kobject_init() instead of before.

No, it's safe to set ktype after kobject_init, it was just not safe to
set the kset.  As Kay pointed out, I just added a patch to my tree to
resolve this issue, and I'll go back and update the documentation now.

I do like the "check for a ktype" warning, I'll go add that to my local
tree and see what breaks.  Odds are, all the static kobjects will :(

thanks,

greg k-h
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/