On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 12:42:22PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:http://www.hypertransport.org/docs/tech/HTC20051222-0046-0008-Final-4-21-06.pdf Table 143 suggest to me that legacy interrupts should be routed to all cpus, which certainly doesn't seem to be the case in this situation. Perhaps Nvidia goofed on that part of the specification? Certainly, this seems like the best solution long term. So I'm looking at the implementation for 64 bit system, and it seems a little cleaner than 32 bit setup. I'm wondering if we can just call setup_IO_APIC immediately after init_IRQ in start_kernel? Could it be that straightforward? Neil -- /*************************************************** *Neil Horman *Software Engineer *Red Hat, Inc. *nhorman@redhat.com *gpg keyid: 1024D / 0x92A74FA1 *http://pgp.mit.edu ***************************************************/ -
| Adrian Bunk | Re: Linux 2.6.21 |
| Linus Torvalds | Linux 2.6.21-rc2 |
| WANG Cong | [-mm Patch] UML: fix a building error |
| Roland McGrath | Re: [PATCH 0/5] ftrace: to kill a daemon |
git: | |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Patrick McHardy | Re: [PATCH] netfilter: use per-cpu spinlock rather than RCU (v3) |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| Theodore Ts'o | Re: cc1 fails silently |
| Michael Nolan | Power routines on notebook cause kernel panic |
| Marc Peters | v 0.11 boot disk problem |
| Dave `geek' Gymer | WARNING (was Re: New afio release) |
