On Tuesday 27 November 2007 21:50:16 Andi Kleen wrote:
Not the goals. I haven't seen the *problem* yet.
That's a real problem, and I sympathise with the idea of marking symbols as
externally useful (or, practically, mark internal).
But we now need to decide what's "externally useful". The currently line for
exports is simple: someone in-tree needs it. You dislike the suggestion to
extend this to "if more than one in-tree needs it it's open".
Currently your criterion seems to be "does the maintainer hate external
modules?" which I don't think will be what you want...
Cheers,
Rusty.
-