On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 03:42:13PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
quoted text
> On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:22:56 -0800 (PST)
> Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 27 Nov 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > 
> > > The prefetch however might still need some work - we can indeed do
> > > prefetch() against a not-possible CPU's memory here.  And I do recall that
> > > 4-5 years ago we did have a CPU (one of mine, iirc) which would oops when
> > > prefetching from a bad address.  I forget what the conclusion was on that
> > > matter.
> > > 
> > > If we do want to fix the prefetch-from-outer-space then we should be using
> > > cpu_isset(cpu, *cpumask) here rather than cpu_possible().
> > 
> > Generally the prefetch things have turned out to be not that useful. How 
> > about dropping the prefetch? I kept it because it was there.
> 
> I don't recall anyone ever demonstrating that prefetch is useful in-kernel.

It was demonstrated useful for some specific cases, like context switch early
fetch on IA64. But I agree the prefetch on each list_for_each() is probably
a bad idea and should be removed. Will also help code size.

The best strategy is probably to figure out which oprofile counters
to use and then do some profiling and only insert prefetches where
the profiler actually finds significant cache misses.

-Andi
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/