[PATCH] x86/paravirt: revert exports to restore old behaviour

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...>, Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@...>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@...>, Zachary Amsden <zach@...>
Date: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 - 6:57 pm

Subdividing the paravirt_ops structure caused a regression in certain
non-GPL modules which try to use mmu_ops and cpu_ops.  This restores
the old behaviour, and makes it consistent with the
non-CONFIG_PARAVIRT case.

Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de> reports:

Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> adds:

Christoph Hellwig objects to this patch on the grounds that modules
shouldn't be using these operations anyway.  I don't think this is a
particularly good reason to reject the patch, for several reasons:

1. These operations are still available to modules when not using
   CONFIG_PARAVIRT, since they are implicitly exported as inline
   functions via the kernel headers.  Exporting the same functionality as
   GPL-only symbols just adds a gratuitious difference between
   CONFIG_PARAVIRT and non-CONFIG_PARAVIRT configurations.  If we really
   think these operations are not for module use (or non-GPL module use),
   then we should solve the problem in a general way.

2. It's a regression from previous kernels, which would work these
   modules even with CONFIG_PARAVIRT enabled.

3. The operations in question seem pretty reasonable for modules to
   use.  The control registers/MSRs can be accessed directly anyway, so there's
   no benefit in preventing modules from using standard interfaces.  And it seems
   reasonable to allow a graphics driver to create its own mappings if it wants.

Therefore, I think this patch should go in for 2.6.24.  If people
really think that these operations should not be available to modules,
then we can address that separately.

Signed-off-by: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <Jeremy.Fitzhardinge@citrix.com>
Cc: Tobias Powalowski <t.powa@gmx.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
Cc: Zachary Amsden <zach@vmware.com>

---
 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_32.c |    4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff -r 0328c71b880c arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_32.c
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_32.c	Tue Nov 27 11:21:09 2007 -0800
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/paravirt_32.c	Tue Nov 27 11:21:16 2007 -0800
@@ -465,8 +465,8 @@ struct pv_mmu_ops pv_mmu_ops = {
 };
 
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pv_time_ops);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pv_cpu_ops);
-EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pv_mmu_ops);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL    (pv_cpu_ops);
+EXPORT_SYMBOL    (pv_mmu_ops);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pv_apic_ops);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pv_info);
 EXPORT_SYMBOL    (pv_irq_ops);

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH] x86/paravirt: revert exports to restore old behaviour, Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Tue Nov 27, 6:57 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: revert exports to restore old beha..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Nov 28, 5:15 pm)
Re: [PATCH] x86/paravirt: revert exports to restore old beha..., Jeremy Fitzhardinge, (Wed Nov 28, 7:57 pm)