Adrian Bunk wrote, On 11/27/2007 05:47 PM:Maybe you are right, maybe I've used wrong words... But, e.g., google pretends to know about this first right too. And I've meant generally, not about open software. I don't demand anything. I've only expressed my personal opinion that usually (if possible) the choice is better than no choice. And, since I don't know anything in open source forbiding this, I can ask, why you demand to take away offered choices; actually, I think it would be much easier if you could fork the other way... It's only a part of the theory: usually it's easier to find some bugs if there is a possibility to compare a performance with other options; there is also kind of stimulation and flow of new ideas between them. Otherwise it's not so hard to overlook some stagnation. Regards, Jarek P. -
| Mike Galbraith | Re: regression: CD burning (k3b) went broke |
| Andi Kleen | [PATCH] [3/22] x86_64: Kill temp boot pmds |
| Alan Cox | Re: [PATCH][RFC] 4K stacks default, not a debug thing any more...? |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
git: | |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 05/37] dccp: Cleanup routines for feature negotiation |
| Brandeburg, Jesse | RE: [PATCH] e1000e: test MSI interrupts |
