On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 10:09:42PM +0100, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Tue, Nov 27, 2007 at 02:00:37PM -0500, Dave Jones wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 10:25:33AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > > > > 1) Why is everyone so concerned that export symbol space is large? > > > - does it cost cpu or running memory? > > > - does it cause bugs? > > > - or are you just worried about "evil modules"? > > > > To clarify something here, by "evil", don't necessarily think "binary only". > > > > Out of tree modules are frequently using symbols that they shouldn't be. > > Because they get no peer-review here, they 'get away with it' for the most part. > > Until distro vendors push rebased kernel updates that removed exports that > > should never have been exported, and suddenly people like me get bombed > > with "Fedora broke my xyz driver" mails. > >... > > The real problem is that these drivers are not in the upstream kernel. You're preaching to the choir. > Are there common reasons why these drivers are not upstream? It varies case by case. Dave -- http://www.codemonkey.org.uk -
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 004/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingPatches |
| Tarkan Erimer | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Matt Mackall | Re: [PATCH] x86: fix unconditional arch/x86/kernel/pcspeaker.c compiling |
| James Bottomley | Re: Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Jarek Poplawski | [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
git: | |
