Re: can support for "rpm"-based package building just be dropped?

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...>
Cc: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...>, Ray Lee <ray-lk@...>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, November 27, 2007 - 9:46 am

On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 05:17:18PM +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:

The point, if I understand it correctly, was that when rpmbuild is not
install and rpm is not building-capable not to fall back to rpm and
instead yell loudly that rpmbuild is missing.

To which some said that right now "do not fall back, ever, just
require rpmbuild" may just be the best.

I have no opinion though.

  OG.

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
can support for "rpm"-based package building just be dropped?, Robert P. J. Day, (Mon Nov 26, 4:54 am)
Re: can support for "rpm"-based package building just be dro..., Robert P. J. Day, (Mon Nov 26, 11:53 am)
Re: can support for "rpm"-based package building just be dro..., Robert P. J. Day, (Mon Nov 26, 12:13 pm)
Re: can support for "rpm"-based package building just be dro..., Olivier Galibert, (Tue Nov 27, 9:46 am)
Re: can support for "rpm"-based package building just be dro..., Robert P. J. Day, (Mon Nov 26, 11:08 am)
Re: can support for "rpm"-based package building just be dro..., Robert P. J. Day, (Mon Nov 26, 11:12 am)