On Sun, Nov 25, 2007 at 01:55:07PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:Why should arch_has_single_step be a function-like macro? I can't thing of a case were this wouln't be a compile-time constant. And given that this is hopefully a transitionary ifdef because eventually all architectures would use the generic code I'd prefer ifdefs in the code that clearly mark this as transitional in this case. And I don't think these should be provided at all as generic stubs. If an arch doesn't use the generic code it simply shouldn't compile the code using this. Whats the reason for the user_ prefix btw, most architectures seems to have these functions already anyway, just without the user_ prefix. -
| Davide Libenzi | Re: [patch 7/8] fdmap v2 - implement sys_socket2 |
| Bart Van Assche | Integration of SCST in the mainstream Linux kernel |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 005/196] Chinese: add translation of SubmittingDrivers |
| Mariusz Kozlowski | [KJ PATCHES] mostly kmalloc + memset conversion to k[cz]alloc |
git: | |
| KOSAKI Motohiro | [bug?] tg3: Failed to load firmware "tigon/tg3_tso.bin" |
| Stefan Richter | Re: [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 0/37] dccp: Feature negotiation - last call for comments |
