[PATCH 01/27] ptrace: arch_has_single_step

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Roland McGrath
Date: Sunday, November 25, 2007 - 2:55 pm

This defines the new macro arch_has_single_step() in linux/ptrace.h, a
default for when asm/ptrace.h does not define it.  It declares the new
user_enable_single_step and user_disable_single_step functions.
This is not used yet, but paves the way to harmonize on this interface
for the arch-specific calls on all machines.

Signed-off-by: Roland McGrath <roland@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/ptrace.h |   46 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/ptrace.h b/include/linux/ptrace.h
index ae8146a..a6effc8 100644
--- a/include/linux/ptrace.h
+++ b/include/linux/ptrace.h
@@ -128,6 +128,52 @@ int generic_ptrace_pokedata(struct task_struct *tsk, long addr, long data);
 #define force_successful_syscall_return() do { } while (0)
 #endif
 
+/*
+ * <asm/ptrace.h> should define the following things inside #ifdef __KERNEL__.
+ *
+ * These do-nothing inlines are used when the arch does not
+ * implement single-step.  The kerneldoc comments are here
+ * to document the interface for all arch definitions.
+ */
+
+#ifndef arch_has_single_step
+/**
+ * arch_has_single_step - does this CPU support user-mode single-step?
+ *
+ * If this is defined, then there must be function declarations or
+ * inlines for user_enable_single_step() and user_disable_single_step().
+ * arch_has_single_step() should evaluate to nonzero iff the machine
+ * supports instruction single-step for user mode.
+ * It can be a constant or it can test a CPU feature bit.
+ */
+#define arch_has_single_step()		(0)
+
+/**
+ * user_enable_single_step - single-step in user-mode task
+ * @task: either current or a task stopped in %TASK_TRACED
+ *
+ * This can only be called when arch_has_single_step() has returned nonzero.
+ * Set @task so that when it returns to user mode, it will trap after the
+ * next single instruction executes.
+ */
+static inline void user_enable_single_step(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+	BUG();			/* This can never be called.  */
+}
+
+/**
+ * user_disable_single_step - cancel user-mode single-step
+ * @task: either current or a task stopped in %TASK_TRACED
+ *
+ * Clear @task of the effects of user_enable_single_step().  This can
+ * be called whether or not user_enable_single_step() was ever called
+ * on @task, and even if arch_has_single_step() returned zero.
+ */
+static inline void user_disable_single_step(struct task_struct *task)
+{
+}
+#endif	/* arch_has_single_step */
+
 #endif
 
 #endif
-- 
1.5.3.4

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH 01/27] ptrace: arch_has_single_step, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 2:55 pm)
[PATCH 02/27] x86: segment selector macros, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 2:58 pm)
[PATCH 03/27] x86: remove TRAP_FLAG, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 2:58 pm)
[PATCH 04/27] x86: arch_has_single_step, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 2:59 pm)
[PATCH 05/27] x86: single_step moved, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 2:59 pm)
[PATCH 06/27] x86: single_step segment macros, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 2:59 pm)
[PATCH 07/27] x86: single_step 0xf0, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:00 pm)
[PATCH 08/27] x86: single_step: share code, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:00 pm)
[PATCH 10/27] ptrace: generic resume, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:01 pm)
[PATCH 11/27] x86-64: ptrace generic resume, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:01 pm)
[PATCH 12/27] x86-32: ptrace generic resume, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:01 pm)
[PATCH 13/27] powerpc: arch_has_single_step, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:03 pm)
[PATCH 14/27] powerpc: ptrace generic resume, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:04 pm)
[PATCH 15/27] x86-32 ptrace: use task_pt_regs, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:04 pm)
[PATCH 16/27] x86-64 ptrace: use task_pt_regs, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:04 pm)
[PATCH 17/27] x86-64 ptrace debugreg cleanup, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:04 pm)
[PATCH 18/27] x86-64 ia32 ptrace debugreg cleanup, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:05 pm)
[PATCH 19/27] x86-32 ptrace debugreg cleanup, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:05 pm)
[PATCH 21/27] ptrace: generic PTRACE_SINGLEBLOCK, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:06 pm)
[PATCH 22/27] x86: debugctlmsr constants, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:06 pm)
[PATCH 23/27] x86: debugctlmsr kconfig, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:08 pm)
[PATCH 24/27] x86: debugctlmsr context switch, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:08 pm)
[PATCH 26/27] x86: debugctlmsr kprobes, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:08 pm)
[PATCH 27/27] x86: PTRACE_SINGLEBLOCK, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH 01/27] ptrace: arch_has_single_step, Christoph Hellwig, (Sun Nov 25, 3:22 pm)
Re: [PATCH 01/27] ptrace: arch_has_single_step, Roland McGrath, (Sun Nov 25, 3:59 pm)
Re: [PATCH 23/27] x86: debugctlmsr kconfig, Denys Vlasenko, (Sun Nov 25, 6:09 pm)
Re: [PATCH 23/27] x86: debugctlmsr kconfig, Roland McGrath, (Mon Nov 26, 12:51 am)
Re: [PATCH 23/27] x86: debugctlmsr kconfig, Roland McGrath, (Mon Nov 26, 1:06 am)
Re: [PATCH 23/27] x86: debugctlmsr kconfig, Denys Vlasenko, (Mon Nov 26, 3:52 pm)
Re: [PATCH 01/27] ptrace: arch_has_single_step, Andrew Morton, (Tue Nov 27, 1:53 am)
Re: [PATCH 01/27] ptrace: arch_has_single_step, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Nov 27, 3:38 am)
Re: [PATCH 01/27] ptrace: arch_has_single_step, Roland McGrath, (Tue Nov 27, 4:05 pm)
Re: [PATCH 01/27] ptrace: arch_has_single_step, Ingo Molnar, (Tue Nov 27, 4:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH 01/27] ptrace: arch_has_single_step, Roland McGrath, (Tue Nov 27, 5:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH 20/27] ptrace: arch_has_block_step, David Wilder, (Wed Nov 28, 4:39 pm)
Re: [PATCH 20/27] ptrace: arch_has_block_step, Roland McGrath, (Wed Nov 28, 4:58 pm)
Re: [PATCH 14/27] powerpc: ptrace generic resume, Srinivasa Ds, (Mon Dec 3, 1:12 am)