On Wed, Nov 21, 2007 at 01:58:06PM +0300, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
quoted text
> On 11/21/07, Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com> wrote:
> > This patch does fix missed increment on counter
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@gmail.com>
> > ---
> > Sorry for that nonstandart patch submission - I've only access
> > to gmail with Internet Explorer on my work. If that is not OK - will resend
> > the patch today evening with mutt.
> >
> >
> Oops - it seems the patch is corrupted a bit. Drop it please - will
> resend today evening. Sorry.

Thanks for the fix, but please cc the maintainer (me) next time, as well
as the arch list (linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org)?

That loop could actually even easier be converted to a
for_each_compatible_node() iteration. There's never more than one
interface on the current boards but it's still nicer coding.

Thanks,

-Olof
-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/