We (the -stable team) are announcing the release of the 2.6.22.14 kernel.

It fixes a bunch of issues, so any user of the 2.6.22 series is

encouraged to upgrade.
I'll also be replying to this message with a copy of the patch between

2.6.22.13 and 2.6.22.14
The updated 2.6.22.y git tree can be found at:

        git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.22.y.git

and can be browsed at the normal kernel.org git web browser:

        http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-2.6.22.y.git;a=su...
thanks,
greg k-h
--------
 Makefile                               |    2

 arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c                 |    5

 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pasemi.c        |    5

 drivers/i2c/chips/eeprom.c             |   37 ++++---

 drivers/ide/pci/serverworks.c          |    1

 drivers/isdn/hardware/avm/b1.c         |   28 ++---

 drivers/isdn/hardware/avm/c4.c         |   14 ++

 drivers/net/forcedeth.c                |   19 ++-

 drivers/scsi/hptiop.c                  |    5

 drivers/usb/core/hcd.h                 |    8 +

 drivers/usb/core/hub.c                 |   15 ++

 drivers/usb/host/ehci-hcd.c            |    8 +

 drivers/usb/serial/generic.c           |    7 -

 drivers/usb/serial/kobil_sct.c         |  170 +++++++++++++--------------------

 fs/ocfs2/aops.c                        |   24 ++++

 include/linux/netlink.h                |    2

 ipc/mqueue.c                           |    6 -

 kernel/futex_compat.c                  |   24 +++-

 kernel/params.c                        |   15 +-

 mm/page-writeback.c                    |    4

 mm/shmem.c                             |   15 ++

 mm/slub.c                              |   22 ----

 net/ipv4/ipcomp.c                      |    3

 net/ipv6/ipcomp6.c                     |    3

 net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_proto_tcp.c |   38 +++----

 net/netlink/af_netlink.c               |   10 -

 net/sched/cls_u32.c                    |    4

 net/sched/sch_teql.c                   |    3

 net/socket.c   ...
[ message continues ]

diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile

index 500f6a8..873c786 100644

--- a/Makefile

+++ b/Makefile

@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@

 VERSION = 2

 PATCHLEVEL = 6

 SUBLEVEL = 22

-EXTRAVERSION = .13

+EXTRAVERSION = .14

 NAME = Holy Dancing Manatees, Batman!
 # *DOCUMENTATION*

diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c b/arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c

index f64b81f..8e02ed6 100644

--- a/arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c

+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/tsc.c

@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ unsigned long native_calculate_cpu_khz(void)

 {

 	unsigned long long start, end;

 	unsigned long count;

-	u64 delta64;

+	u64 delta64 = (u64)ULLONG_MAX;

 	int i;

 	unsigned long flags;
@@ -134,6 +134,7 @@ unsigned long native_calculate_cpu_khz(void)

 		rdtscll(start);

 		mach_countup(&count);

 		rdtscll(end);

+		delta64 = min(delta64, (end - start));

 	}

 	/*

 	 * Error: ECTCNEVERSET

@@ -144,8 +145,6 @@ unsigned long native_calculate_cpu_khz(void)

 	if (count <= 1)

 		goto err;
-	delta64 = end - start;

-

 	/* cpu freq too fast: */

 	if (delta64 > (1ULL<<32))

 		goto err;

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pasemi.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pasemi.c

index 58e3271..dcf5dec 100644

--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pasemi.c

+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-pasemi.c

@@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ struct pasemi_smbus {

 #define MRXFIFO_DATA_M	0x000000ff
 #define SMSTA_XEN	0x08000000

+#define SMSTA_MTN	0x00200000
 #define CTL_MRR		0x00000400

 #define CTL_MTR		0x00000200

@@ -98,6 +99,10 @@ static unsigned int pasemi_smb_waitready(struct pasemi_smbus *smbus)

 		status = reg_read(smbus, REG_SMSTA);

 	}
+	/* Got NACK? */

+	if (status & SMSTA_MTN)

+		return -ENXIO;

+

 	if (timeout < 0) {

 		dev_warn(&smbus->dev->dev, "Timeout, status 0x%08x\n", status);

 		reg_write(smbus, REG_SMSTA, status);

diff --git a/drivers/i2c/chips/eeprom.c b/drivers/i2c/chips/eeprom.c

index bfce13c..5ad36ab 100644

--- a/drivers/i2c/chips/eeprom.c

+++ b/drivers/i2c/chips/eeprom.c

@@ -125,13 +125,20 @@ static ssize_t eeprom_read(struct kobject *kobj...
[ message continues ]

Hi Greg,
I think this hunk in the 2.6.22.14 stable patch may be a mis-patch --

compared to Linus's current git -- the new code should be inserted below

the while loop that follows.
Also see commit 9f96cb1e8bca179a92afa40dfc3c49990f1cfc71
Sven
-

But this one does rearrange things quite a bit and is not included. That

is why things look out of order compared to current git.

-

Hm, I'm confused.  Why is this a mis-patch?
Care to send me a fix against 2.6.22.14 that solves this issue?
thanks,
greg k-h

-

The implementation in 2.6.22.14 is just divergent in from mainline's,

and looked peculiar in context of what some RT bugfix was doing.
Sorry for the noise. 
--