[PATCH -mm 1/2] kill PT_PTRACED

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Oleg Nesterov
Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 - 8:21 am

Since the patch

	"Fix ptrace_attach()/ptrace_traceme()/de_thread() race"
	commit f5b40e363ad6041a96e3da32281d8faa191597b9

we set PT_ATTACHED and change child->parent "atomically" wrt task_list lock.

This means we can remove the checks like "PT_ATTACHED && ->parent != ptracer"
which were needed to catch the "ptrace attach is in progress" case. We can also
remove the flag itself since nobody else uses it.

Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@tv-sign.ru>

--- PT/include/linux/ptrace.h~1_PT_ATTACHED	2007-07-28 16:58:17.000000000 +0400
+++ PT/include/linux/ptrace.h	2007-11-20 17:22:13.000000000 +0300
@@ -67,7 +67,6 @@
 #define PT_TRACE_EXEC	0x00000080
 #define PT_TRACE_VFORK_DONE	0x00000100
 #define PT_TRACE_EXIT	0x00000200
-#define PT_ATTACHED	0x00000400	/* parent != real_parent */
 
 #define PT_TRACE_MASK	0x000003f4
 
--- PT/kernel/ptrace.c~1_PT_ATTACHED	2007-11-20 17:16:10.000000000 +0300
+++ PT/kernel/ptrace.c	2007-11-20 17:26:05.000000000 +0300
@@ -100,8 +100,7 @@ int ptrace_check_attach(struct task_stru
 	 */
 	read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
 	if ((child->ptrace & PT_PTRACED) && child->parent == current &&
-	    (!(child->ptrace & PT_ATTACHED) || child->real_parent != current)
-	    && child->signal != NULL) {
+	     child->sighand != NULL) {
 		ret = 0;
 		spin_lock_irq(&child->sighand->siglock);
 		if (is_task_stopped(child)) {
@@ -202,8 +201,7 @@ repeat:
 		goto bad;
 
 	/* Go */
-	task->ptrace |= PT_PTRACED | ((task->real_parent != current)
-				      ? PT_ATTACHED : 0);
+	task->ptrace |= PT_PTRACED;
 	if (capable(CAP_SYS_PTRACE))
 		task->ptrace |= PT_PTRACE_CAP;
 
--- PT/kernel/signal.c~1_PT_ATTACHED	2007-11-20 17:16:10.000000000 +0300
+++ PT/kernel/signal.c	2007-11-20 17:27:28.000000000 +0300
@@ -1577,11 +1577,6 @@ static inline int may_ptrace_stop(void)
 {
 	if (!likely(current->ptrace & PT_PTRACED))
 		return 0;
-
-	if (unlikely(current->parent == current->real_parent &&
-		    (current->ptrace & PT_ATTACHED)))
-		return 0;
-
 	/*
 	 * Are we in the middle of do_coredump?
 	 * If so and our tracer is also part of the coredump stopping
--- PT/kernel/exit.c~1_PT_ATTACHED	2007-11-20 17:16:10.000000000 +0300
+++ PT/kernel/exit.c	2007-11-20 17:21:52.000000000 +0300
@@ -1513,18 +1513,7 @@ static int wait_task_continued(struct ta
 
 static inline int my_ptrace_child(struct task_struct *p)
 {
-	if (!(p->ptrace & PT_PTRACED))
-		return 0;
-	if (!(p->ptrace & PT_ATTACHED))
-		return 1;
-	/*
-	 * This child was PTRACE_ATTACH'd.  We should be seeing it only if
-	 * we are the attacher.  If we are the real parent, this is a race
-	 * inside ptrace_attach.  It is waiting for the tasklist_lock,
-	 * which we have to switch the parent links, but has already set
-	 * the flags in p->ptrace.
-	 */
-	return (p->parent != p->real_parent);
+	return p->ptrace & PT_PTRACED;
 }
 
 static long do_wait(pid_t pid, int options, struct siginfo __user *infop,

-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[PATCH -mm 1/2] kill PT_PTRACED, Oleg Nesterov, (Tue Nov 20, 8:21 am)
Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] kill PT_PTRACED, Roland McGrath, (Tue Nov 20, 2:08 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] kill PT_PTRACED, Oleg Nesterov, (Tue Nov 20, 2:20 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] kill PT_PTRACED, Roland McGrath, (Tue Nov 20, 2:28 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] kill PT_PTRACED, Andrew Morton, (Tue Nov 20, 2:37 pm)
Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] kill PT_PTRACED, Oleg Nesterov, (Tue Nov 20, 2:43 pm)