Re: [rfc 44/45] Remove local_t support

!MAILaRCHIVE_VOTE_RePLACE
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
To: <clameter@...>
Cc: <ak@...>, <akpm@...>, <travis@...>, <linux-kernel@...>
Date: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 - 8:59 am

* clameter@sgi.com (clameter@sgi.com) wrote:

The question that arises is : are there some architectures that do not
provide fast PER_CPU ops but provides fast local atomic ops ?


-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Computer Engineering Ph.D. Student, Ecole Polytechnique de Montreal
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
[rfc 44/45] Remove local_t support, , (Mon Nov 19, 9:12 pm)
Re: [rfc 44/45] Remove local_t support, Mathieu Desnoyers, (Tue Nov 20, 8:59 am)
Re: [rfc 44/45] Remove local_t support, Christoph Lameter, (Tue Nov 20, 4:48 pm)