On Tue, 20 Nov 2007 07:55:22 +0000 Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com> wrote:

quoted text
> On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 22:43 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 18 Nov 2007 09:13:24 +0000 Scott James Remnant <scott@ubuntu.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > In wait_task_stopped() exit_code already contains the right value for
> > > the si_status member of siginfo, and this is simply set in the non
> > > WNOWAIT case.
> > >     
> > > Pass it unchanged to wait_noreap_copyout();  we would only need to
> > > shift it and add 0x7f if we were returning it in the user status field
> > > and that isn't used for any function that permits WNOWAIT.
> > >     
> > Is this bug visible to userspace?  If so, I'm surprised that none of the
> > various testsuites (which like to exercise this sort of interface) has
> > detected it.
> > 
> Absolutely;  if you call waitid() with a stopped or traced process,
> you'll get the signal in siginfo.si_status as expected -- however if you
> call waitid(WNOWAIT) at the same time, you'll get the signal << 8 | 0x7f
> 

hm, OK.  Well I guess I'll stick a for-2.6.23 tag on this as well as
queueing it for 2.6.24.

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/