Thanks for the feedback :-)
Mingming Cao wrote:
quoted text > On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 22:12 +0800, Coly Li wrote:
>> Basic idea of my dir inode reservation patch can be found here,
>>
http://lists.openwall.net/linux-ext4/2007/11/05/3
>>
>> 1, What does dir inode reservation do
>> Dir inode reservation tries to reserve several inodes in inodes table for a directory when this
>> directory is created. When create new file under this directory, try to allocate inode from the
>> reserved inodes area. This is called as dir_ireserve inode allocator.
>>
> Thanks for the update.
>
> Let me try to understand your method:
>
> So the basic idea is not do linear inode allocation for directory? Inode
> structure block for directory file is only coming from block 0, N, N
> +N,... where the number of skipped blocks N is stored in the in-core
> superblock structure.
N is not stored in in-core superblock. N = s_dir_ireserve_nr / inodes_per_block. What is stored in
in-core superblock is number of inodes to be reserved for each directory.
quoted text >
> When ever need to allocate an inode for directory, skip N reserved bits
> (space for N*16 inodes) if the previous block is already allocated. That
> way place two directories with the hole of N*16 inodes structures, then
> allow files under the first directory stay closer with their parent
> directory. Is this correct?
The hole is (s_dir_ireserve_nr - 1), not N * s_dir_ireserve_nr. Because directory inode will also
use a inode slot from reserved area, reset slots number for files is (s_dir_ireserve_nr - 1).
Except for the reserved inodes number, your understanding exactly matches my idea.
quoted text >
>
>> 4, Dir inode reservation is optional
>> Dir inode reservation is optional, you can use -o followed by one of these options to enable dir
>> inode reservation during mount ext4 file system:
>> dir_ireserve=low
>> dir_ireserve=normal
>> dir_ireserve=high
>
> Would be nice to pass the tuning info low/normal/high(16/64/128 blocks
> correspondingly) via something else rather than mount options.
Sure, I agree with you. Also I am thinking should this patch permit user to input reserved inodes
number directly other than a low/normal/high. Also I am looking for methods to display the tuning
info more convenient to users.
quoted text >
>> Currently, 'low' reserves 15 file inodes for each directory, 'normal' reserves 31 inodes and 'high'
>> reserves 127 inodes. Reserving more than 127 inodes does not help to performance obviously.
>>
>>
>> 5, Performance number
>> On a Core-Duo, 2MB DDM memory, 7200 RPM SATA PC, I built a 50GB ext4 partition, and tried to create
>> 50000 directories, and create 15 (1KB) files in each directory alternatively. After a remount, I
>> tried to remove all the directories and files recursively by a 'rm -rf'. Bellow is the benchmark result,
>> normal ext4 ext4 with dir inode reservation
>> mount options: -o data=writeback -o data=writeback,dir_ireserve=low
>> Create dirs: real 0m49.101s real 2m59.703s
>> Create files: real 24m17.962s real 21m8.161s
>> Unlink all: real 24m43.788s real 17m29.862s
>> Creating dirs with dir inode reservation is slower than normal ext4 as predicted, because allocating
>> directory inodes in non-linear order will cause extra hard disk seeking and block I/O.
>
> Hmm...I suspect there is bug in your patch, the extra seek should not
> contribute to 4 times slower
I agree with you :-)
quoted text >
>> #include <linux/time.h>
>> @@ -478,6 +480,75 @@ static int find_group_other(struct super_block *sb, struct inode *parent,
>> return -1;
>> }
>>
>> +static int ext4_ino_from_ireserve(handle_t *handle, struct inode *dir,
>> + int mode, ext4_group_t *group, unsigned long *ino)
>> +{
>> + struct super_block *sb;
>> + struct ext4_sb_info *sbi;
>> + struct ext4_group_desc *gdp = NULL;
>> + struct buffer_head *gdp_bh = NULL, *bitmap_bh = NULL;
>> + ext4_group_t ires_group = *group;
>> + unsigned long ires_ino;
>> + int i, bit;
>> +
>> + sb = dir->i_sb;
>> + sbi = EXT4_SB(sb);
>> +
>> + /* if the inode number is not for directory,
>> + * only try to allocate after directory's inode
>> + */
>> + if (!S_ISDIR(mode)) {
>> + *ino = dir->i_ino % EXT4_INODES_PER_GROUP(sb);
>> + return 0;
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* reserve inodes for new directory */
>> + for (i = 0; i < sbi->s_groups_count; i++) {
>> + gdp = ext4_get_group_desc(sb, ires_group, &gdp_bh);
>> + if (!gdp)
>> + goto fail;
>> + bit = 0;
>> +try_same_group:
>> + if (bit < EXT4_INODES_PER_GROUP(sb)) {
>> + brelse(bitmap_bh);
>> + bitmap_bh = read_inode_bitmap(sb, ires_group);
>> + if (!bitmap_bh)
>> + goto fail;
>> +
>> + BUFFER_TRACE(bitmap_bh, "get_write_access");
>> + if (ext4_journal_get_write_access(
>> + handle, bitmap_bh) != 0)
>> + goto fail;
>> + if (!ext4_set_bit_atomic(sb_bgl_lock(sbi, ires_group),
>> + bit, bitmap_bh->b_data)) {
>> + /* we won it */
>> + BUFFER_TRACE(bitmap_bh,
>> + "call ext4_journal_dirty_metadata");
>> + if (ext4_journal_dirty_metadata(handle,
>> + bitmap_bh) != 0)
>> + goto fail;
>> + ires_ino = bit;
>> + goto find;
>> + }
>> + /* we lost it */
>> + jbd2_journal_release_buffer(handle, bitmap_bh);
>> + bit += sbi->s_dir_ireserve_nr;
>> + goto try_same_group;
>> + }
>> + if (++ires_group == sbi->s_groups_count)
>> + ires_group = 0;
>> + }
>> + goto fail;
>> +find:
>> + brelse(bitmap_bh);
>> + *group = ires_group;
>> + *ino = ires_ino;
>> + return 0;
>> +fail:
>> + brelse(bitmap_bh);
>> + return -ENOSPC;
>> +}
>> +
>> /*
>> * There are two policies for allocating an inode. If the new inode is
>> * a directory, then a forward search is made for a block group with both
>> @@ -543,6 +614,12 @@ struct inode *ext4_new_inode(handle_t *handle, struct inode * dir, int mode)
>>
>> ino = 0;
>>
>> + if (test_opt(sb, DIR_IRESERVE)) {
>> + err = ext4_ino_from_ireserve(handle, dir,
>> + mode, &group, &ino);
>> + if ((!err) && S_ISDIR(mode))
>> + goto got;
>> + }
>
>
> So you are calling ext4_ino_from_ireserve() inside a loop iterate all
> block groups? I think this is bug, it should move outside of the loop.
>
Hmm, sure, putting ext4_ino_from_ireserve() in this loop is redundant, it should be out of this
loop. Neat eyes:-) So this is second bug in my patch.
I will submit V4 patch and basic benchmark number before next internal conf-call. Thanks for your
review, great help to me :-)
quoted text >> repeat_in_this_group:
>> ino = ext4_find_next_zero_bit((unsigned long *)
>> bitmap_bh->b_data, EXT4_INODES_PER_GROUP(sb), ino);
>> diff --git a/fs/ext4/super.c b/fs/ext4/super.c
>> index b626339..9b873b7 100644
>> --- a/fs/ext4/super.c
>> +++ b/fs/ext4/super.c
>> @@ -884,6 +884,7 @@ enum {
>> Opt_commit, Opt_journal_update, Opt_journal_inum, Opt_journal_dev,
>> Opt_journal_checksum, Opt_journal_async_commit,
>> Opt_abort, Opt_data_journal, Opt_data_ordered, Opt_data_writeback,
>> + Opt_dir_ireserve_low, Opt_dir_ireserve_normal, Opt_dir_ireserve_high,
>> Opt_usrjquota, Opt_grpjquota, Opt_offusrjquota, Opt_offgrpjquota,
>> Opt_jqfmt_vfsold, Opt_jqfmt_vfsv0, Opt_quota, Opt_noquota,
>> Opt_ignore, Opt_barrier, Opt_err, Opt_resize, Opt_usrquota,
>> @@ -929,6 +930,9 @@ static match_table_t tokens = {
>> {Opt_data_journal, "data=journal"},
>> {Opt_data_ordered, "data=ordered"},
>> {Opt_data_writeback, "data=writeback"},
>> + {Opt_dir_ireserve_low, "dir_ireserve=low"},
>> + {Opt_dir_ireserve_normal, "dir_ireserve=normal"},
>> + {Opt_dir_ireserve_high, "dir_ireserve=high"},
>> {Opt_offusrjquota, "usrjquota="},
>> {Opt_usrjquota, "usrjquota=%s"},
>> {Opt_offgrpjquota, "grpjquota="},
>> @@ -1311,6 +1315,18 @@ clear_qf_name:
>> return 0;
>> sbi->s_stripe = option;
>> break;
>> + case Opt_dir_ireserve_low:
>> + set_opt(sbi->s_mount_opt, DIR_IRESERVE);
>> + sbi->s_dir_ireserve_nr = EXT4_DIR_IRESERVE_LOW;
>> + break;
>> + case Opt_dir_ireserve_normal:
>> + set_opt(sbi->s_mount_opt, DIR_IRESERVE);
>> + sbi->s_dir_ireserve_nr = EXT4_DIR_IRESERVE_NORMAL;
>> + break;
>> + case Opt_dir_ireserve_high:
>> + set_opt(sbi->s_mount_opt, DIR_IRESERVE);
>> + sbi->s_dir_ireserve_nr = EXT4_DIR_IRESERVE_HIGH;
>> + break;
>> default:
>> printk (KERN_ERR
>> "EXT4-fs: Unrecognized mount option \"%s\" "
>> diff --git a/include/linux/ext4_fs.h b/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
>> index bcdb59d..88f5173 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/ext4_fs.h
>> @@ -92,6 +92,13 @@ struct ext4_allocation_request {
>> #define EXT4_GOOD_OLD_FIRST_INO 11
>>
>> /*
>> + * Macro-instructions used to reserve inodes for directories
>> + */
>> +#define EXT4_DIR_IRESERVE_LOW 16
>> +#define EXT4_DIR_IRESERVE_NORMAL 64
>> +#define EXT4_DIR_IRESERVE_HIGH 128
>> +
>> +/*
>> * Maximal count of links to a file
>> */
>> #define EXT4_LINK_MAX 65000
>> @@ -502,6 +509,7 @@ do { \
>> #define EXT4_MOUNT_JOURNAL_ASYNC_COMMIT 0x1000000 /* Journal Async Commit */
>> #define EXT4_MOUNT_DELALLOC 0x2000000 /* Delalloc support */
>> #define EXT4_MOUNT_MBALLOC 0x4000000 /* Buddy allocation support */
>> +#define EXT4_MOUNT_DIR_IRESERVE 0x10000000/* dir inode reservation */
>> /* Compatibility, for having both ext2_fs.h and ext4_fs.h included at once */
>> #ifndef _LINUX_EXT2_FS_H
>> #define clear_opt(o, opt) o &= ~EXT4_MOUNT_##opt
>> diff --git a/include/linux/ext4_fs_sb.h b/include/linux/ext4_fs_sb.h
>> index 744e746..790b0cf 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/ext4_fs_sb.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/ext4_fs_sb.h
>> @@ -147,6 +147,8 @@ struct ext4_sb_info {
>>
>> /* locality groups */
>> struct ext4_locality_group *s_locality_groups;
>> + /* number of inodes we reserve in a directory */
>> + int s_dir_ireserve_nr;
>> };
>> #define EXT4_GROUP_INFO(sb, group) \
>> EXT4_SB(sb)->s_group_info[(group) >> EXT4_DESC_PER_BLOCK_BITS(sb)] \
>>
>>
>
--
Coly Li
SuSE PRC Labs
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/ Messages in current thread:
Re: [PATCH] ext4: dir inode reservation V3 , Coly Li , (Mon Nov 19, 9:14 pm)
