Re: [rfc 00/45] [RFC] CPU ops and a rework of per cpu data handling on x86_64

Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]
From: Andi Kleen
Date: Monday, November 19, 2007 - 8:25 pm

> Although we have a per-cpu area base in a fixed global register

Again might be pointing out the obvious, but you 
need of course save_flags()/restore_flags(), not disable/enable().

If it was just disable/enable x86 could do it much faster too 
and Christoph probably would never felt the need to approach
this project for his SLUB fast path.

-Andi
-
Previous message: [thread] [date] [author]
Next message: [thread] [date] [author]

Messages in current thread:
Re: [rfc 00/45] [RFC] CPU ops and a rework of per cpu data ..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Nov 19, 6:18 pm)
Re: [rfc 00/45] [RFC] CPU ops and a rework of per cpu data ..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Nov 19, 6:59 pm)
Re: [rfc 00/45] [RFC] CPU ops and a rework of per cpu data ..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Nov 19, 7:12 pm)
Re: [rfc 00/45] [RFC] CPU ops and a rework of per cpu data ..., Andi Kleen, (Mon Nov 19, 8:25 pm)
Re: [rfc 00/45] [RFC] CPU ops and a rework of per cpu data ..., Christoph Lameter, (Mon Nov 19, 8:33 pm)