From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@hpl.hp.com>
Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 14:48:46 -0800
quoted text > Looks like we will have to use bytes (u8) instead. This may have some
> performance impact as well. Several bitmaps are used in the context/interrupt
> routines. Even with u8, there is still a problem with the bitmap*() macros.
> Now, only a small subset of the bitmap() macros are used, so it may be okay
> to duplicate them for u8.
I think it would be fine to just create a set of bitop interfaces that
operate on u32 objects instead of "unsigned long".
Currently perfmon2 does not need the atomic variants at all, and those
could thus be provided entirely under include/asm-generic/bitops/
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: [perfmon] Re: [perfmon2] perfmon2 merge news , David Miller , (Mon Nov 19, 8:53 pm)