Felix von Leitner wrote:
quoted text
> Thus spake Rick Jones (rick.jones2@hp.com):
> 
>>>Oh I'm pretty sure it's not my application, because my application performs
>>>well over ethernet, which is after all its purpose.  Also I see the
>>>write, the TCP uncork, then a pause, and then the packet leaving.
>>
>>Well, a wise old engineer tried to teach me that the proper spelling is 
>>ass-u-me :) so just for grins, you might try the TCP_RR test anyway :)  And 
>>even if your application is correct (although I wonder why the receiver 
>>isn't sucking data-out very quickly...) if you can reproduce the problem 
>>with netperf it will be easier for others to do so.
> 
> 
> My application is only the server, the receiver is smbget from Samba, so
> I don't feel responsible for it :-)

Might want to strace it anyway... no good deed (such as reporting a potential 
issue) goes unpunished :)

quoted text
> Still, when run over Ethernet, it works fine without waiting for
> timeouts to expire.

Past performance is no guarantee of current correctness :)  And over an 
Ethernet, there will be a very different set of both timings and TCP segment 
sizes compared to loopback.

My guess is that you will find setting the lo mtu to 1500 a very interesting 
experiment.

quoted text
> 
> To reproduce this:
> 
>   - smbget is from samba, you probably already have this
>   - gatling (my server) can be gotten from
>     cvs -d :pserver:cvs@cvs.fefe.de:/cvs -z9 co dietlibc libowfat gatling
> 
> dietlibc is not strictly needed, but it's my environment.
> First built dietlibc, then libowfat, then gatling.
> 
> Felix

-
unsubscribe notice
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/