* Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> wrote:
quoted text > > This means that even if some cpu is stuck in a spinlock loop with
> > interrupts disabled, you'd see it with this thing. The way it works
> > is that cross cpu vectored interrupts are disabled independently of
> > the processor interrupt level on sparc64.
>
> That's really sweet. I'd better put my code where my mouth is as
> well... this patch seems to be about the best we can do as a generic
> fallback without getting a dedicated vector (which has to be done in
> arch code anyway).
btw., in -rt we had something like this implemented as an NMI mechanism
(for x86) - that way it's guaranteed that we get some output even from
locked up CPUs.
Ingo
-
unsubscribe notice To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at
http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Messages in current thread:
Re: 2.6.23 regression: accessing invalid mmap'ed memory fr ... , Ingo Molnar , (Fri Nov 2, 8:36 am)