On Nov 19, 2007 8:56 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:I have SLUB_DEBUG=y, but not SLUB_DEBUG_ON. But apart from this message I did not the anything in the syslog. It seems to not be onetime event, as one the third boot it happend again. Stacktrace was identical. Sadly trying 3 boots with slub_debug=FZP and another one with only F did not trigger it. But I don't think kcryptd is freeing a bio at that point. The message said about the freed lock: (kcryptd){--..}, at: [<ffffffff80247dd9>] (gdb) list *0xffffffff80247dd9 0xffffffff80247dd9 is in run_workqueue (include/asm/bitops_64.h:69). 64 * you should call smp_mb__before_clear_bit() and/or smp_mb__after_clear_bit() 65 * in order to ensure changes are visible on other processors. 66 */ 67 static inline void clear_bit(int nr, volatile void *addr) 68 { 69 __asm__ __volatile__( LOCK_PREFIX 70 "btrl %1,%0" 71 :ADDR 72 :"dIr" (nr)); 73 } increasing the addr a little bit shows: (gdb) list *0xffffffff80247ddf 0xffffffff80247ddf is in run_workqueue (kernel/workqueue.c:275). 270 list_del_init(cwq->worklist.next); 271 spin_unlock_irq(&cwq->lock); 272 273 BUG_ON(get_wq_data(work) != cwq); 274 work_clear_pending(work); 275 lock_acquire(&cwq->wq->lockdep_map, 0, 0, 0, 2, _THIS_IP_); 276 lock_acquire(&lockdep_map, 0, 0, 0, 2, _THIS_IP_); 277 f(work); 278 lock_release(&lockdep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); 279 lock_release(&cwq->wq->lockdep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); Above this acquire/release sequence is the following comment: #ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP /* * It is permissible to free the struct work_struct * from inside the function that is called from it, * this we need to take into account for lockdep too. * To avoid bogus "held lock freed" warnings as well * as problems when looking into work->lockdep_map, * make a copy and use that here. */ struct lockdep_map lockdep_map = work->lockdep_map; #endif Did something trigger this anyway? Anything I could try, apart from more boots with slub_debug=F? Torsten -
| Andrew Morton | -mm merge plans for 2.6.23 |
| Greg KH | [GIT PATCH] driver core patches against 2.6.24 |
| Greg KH | Re: Dual-Licensing Linux Kernel with GPL V2 and GPL V3 |
| Tomasz Kłoczko | Is it time for remove (crap) ALSA from kernel tree ? |
git: | |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| Paweł Staszewski | iproute2 action/policer question |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
