A competing OS vendor is claiming that the Linux kernel has no way to measure the following: a. Time spent waiting for page faults in percent b. Total transfer time for each auxiliary memory in percent c. Time in percent when one or more tasks were blocked waiting for memory resources d. Time spent waiting for page faults in percent I was wondering if the claims were pure FUD or are measurements possible -- whether they are actually implemented or not is not important (at least at this stage). Apologies if the descriptions aren't very precise; OTOH that leaves us room to interpret the claims in a favourable (to us) manner :) TIA and regards, -- Raju -- Raj Mathur raju@kandalaya.org http://kandalaya.org/ Freedom in Technology & Software || February 2008 || http://freed.in/ GPG: 78D4 FC67 367F 40E2 0DD5 0FEF C968 D0EF CC68 D17F PsyTrance & Chill: http://schizoid.in/ || It is the mind that moves -
| Ingo Molnar | [patch 12/13] syslets: x86: optimized copy_uatom() |
| Greg Kroah-Hartman | [PATCH 017/196] aoechr: Convert from class_device to device |
| Yinghai Lu | Re: 2.6.26, PAT and AMD family 6 |
| Jan Engelhardt | intel iommu (Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.23) |
git: | |
| Gerrit Renker | [PATCH 27/37] dccp: Integration of dynamic feature activation - part 2 (server side) |
| David Miller | [GIT]: Networking |
| David Miller | Re: [PATCH] pkt_sched: Destroy gen estimators under rtnl_lock(). |
| Natalie Protasevich | [BUG] New Kernel Bugs |
